|
||||
|
Well, I would usually recommend not using any stop lower than 2.5 on portraiture. Many, many people go all the way out to 1.4 or 1.8 and then get the nose or one eye in focus, and wonder why. For tack-sharp portraits, 2.5 is a good starting point. You're working with a focal depth of a little more than an inch at 1.4. So I don't think that the aperture should be what makes the decision necessarily, meaning, you can get as wide as 2.5 with either lens.
I am under the impression the 85mm is a higher-quality lens. It's quite a bit more expensive and typically, with Canon prime lenses, the more $$ the higher quality the lens. **Usually.** However. If you're also interested in using the lens for other things like scenery, it depends on whether or not you typically do wide-angle with scenery or more of a telephoto feel. There is a big difference between the 50mm and the 85mm as far as focal length. Do you have another acceptable wide-angle lens for when you need it? It might be good to try a telephoto lens that goes at least to 85mm (at a mall or a large store) so you can see how much zoom there is. I definitely don't think you need the 1.4. You probably don't need that extra aperture stop unless you do a lot of close-up, artsy-interpretive kind of pseudo-macro photography. It's a couple hundred dollars more for that one stop. I personally would be happy with my 50mm if it started at 2.8. I get unbelievably gorgeous bokeh at 5.6 with my 250mm and my 400mm. Keep in mind the distance to your subject, and the subject's distance from the background affect bokeh as well. So, to summarize. I have two good zoom lenses and a decent wide-angle lens right now. If I had money to buy another prime, I'd buy the 85mm 1.8. Didn't help much, did it?
__________________
Sarah ![]() Equipment: Canon T2i (550D) with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, 55-250mm f/4-5.6, 50mm f/1.8, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses Software: Windows 7, PSE 10 (Editor), PSE 6 (Organizer), and PSCS 4 |
|
||||
|
I just got the 85mm for my Nikon and I absolutely love it! The bokeh is incredible!!! I can blur out ugly backgrounds and since my house is pretty dark, I do use the large aperature quite a bit, although Sarah is completely right about everything she said!
__________________
Anke ![]() ![]() ![]() My gear: Nikon: D700, 50mm 1.4, 24-70 mm 2.8, 17-35 mm 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 85mm 1.4 Tamron:18-270mm 3.5-6.3, 90mm 2.8, LR 2.7, CS5 on a 17" MacBookPro. Member NAPP My blog |
|
||||
|
Kristen ... I recently went through the same process of "which" lens to buy. I have a 200mm f2.8 L series that I absolutely love and a 60mm f2.8 macro that I love just as much (wish it was the 100mm though :-). But I wanted to replace my 18-55mm kit lens something fierce. After a lot of searching, reading, reviewing and trying to be realistic about how much I should spend on a pleasure not a necessity, I decided on the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8. I LOVE IT. Gives me a wide angle for landscape type shots along with a decent zoom option all in one package .. it stays on my camera 90% of the time. I also have the 55-250mm that I use for some outdoor shooting but since I got the 200mm and 28-75mm, it stays at home most of the time. Good luck .. it can be a daunting task to decide what to buy .. with each good review there seems to be two bad ones.
__________________
Gail |
|
||||
|
Yes very helpful - but it's not the bokeh that I was concerned about - cause I'm thinking I would hardly go down to f1.4 so the real question is the 85mm or 50mm. And the only other lens that I have the kit lens; i thought I read that the 85mm is best for further away and the 50mm for up close - is that true?? And the 85mm f1.8 wasn't that much more - I found one for $399 - or was I dreaming?!
So - I'm guessing you ladies would prefer the 85mm over the 50mm??? ![]() Thanks! Kristen |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Sarah ![]() Equipment: Canon T2i (550D) with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, 55-250mm f/4-5.6, 50mm f/1.8, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses Software: Windows 7, PSE 10 (Editor), PSE 6 (Organizer), and PSCS 4 |
|
||||
|
I was really frustrated with the 85mm... I felt like I had to keep backing up too far away from my subjects. I wanted the low aperture for indoor lighting but found that I just couldn't get the shot in. I love my 50
The lens I use for portraiture is the 24-70mm 2.8. That lens rarely comes off my camera!
__________________
![]() ![]() My Camera - Canon 50D - soon to own 5D Mark III ![]() My Lenses - 50mm 1.2, 70-200mm f4, 24-70mm 2.8, 100mm 2.8 My Software - Photoshop CS5, Lightroom 3 |
|
||||
|
You guys are making me want to get another lens. I have been wanting a macro, and also have been wanting the big daddy - 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, but every time I get ready to buy it, I decide to spend it on something more necessary. I'm loving this thread.
__________________
-Joanie Gear: Canon 5D / Canon T1I, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4, Canon G10, Wacom Graphire Software: CS3, Noiseware
|
|
||||
|
Everyone has basically said my thoughts!! If you do close ups mostly, it's going to be tricky with both of them if you are using a large aperture! I'd pick the 50 first! It's a little but if a wider angel and it's cheaper! You can always get another lens later! I'm like Jen, 95% of the time I have my 17-55 2.8 on my camera! Good luck with your decision!
|
|
||||
|
I just looked up the 17-55mm 2.8 and it's a $1000 - not quite in my range yet! I do make money off of my photos but not enough to justify that yet.. the 85mm was about $400 give or take and the 50mm was $369 on B&H Photo but only about $200 on amazon.
Can't believe how tough this is! I still need a flash, reflector and umbrella so I may go with the 50mm for right now and then upgrade when I book more shoots. You all have been so helpful; it's interesting to see what people like and dislike ![]() Kristen |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good luck!
__________________
Sarah ![]() Equipment: Canon T2i (550D) with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, 55-250mm f/4-5.6, 50mm f/1.8, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses Software: Windows 7, PSE 10 (Editor), PSE 6 (Organizer), and PSCS 4 |
|
||||
|
I own both lenses (well my 50mm is 1.8f rather than the 1.4). My 85mm is my most recent buy and I have to say my 50mm is still on my camera 90% of the time. The 85mm is just too much of a squeeze indoors - I find myself backing way up. On the picture quality side the bokeh is slightly better on the 85mm but not enough to make that much of a difference to me. Another big plus for me is the 50mm is lighter (I am a bit of a weakling though!!!).
Let us know what you decide on... x
__________________
Georgina ![]() My camera: Canon 5D Mark II ![]() Lenses: 50mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8 Software: PSE 7 and Lightroom 3.7 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Myra
|
|
||||
|
Ok ladies - I did it! I just purchased the 50mm 1.4f Canon lens! I have added the 24-70mm 2.8f to my wish list! I also purchased a 5 in 1 reflector.. now I am so excited to get it in the mail and practice with it!
Thank you all so so much for your input!
__________________
Kristen ![]() Equipment: Canon Rebel T3i, 50mm 1.4f lens, 300mm lens Software: Photoshop CS5; Lightroom 3 |
|
||||
|
Sounds exciting! Look forward to seeing your photos.
__________________
Carolyn Blog: House of Amson My Camera: Nikon D300 Lenses Include: Nikon 18-200, Nikon 50 mm 1.8 and 1.4, Tokina Macro 100mm 2.8, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 (newest indulgence) |
|
||||
|
My 50mm f/1.4 (Canon version by Sigma) is an amazing lens. It's practically glued to my camera.
![]() I'm thinking about upgrading to a full frame body, and I would probably want the 85 mm then...
__________________
-call me anx -My Gallery My toys: Canon 5D mkII, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS, Canon 100 mm f/2.8 macro, Sigma 50 mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 MacbookPro with Lightroom 3, Adobe CS5 Design Premium ![]() |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|